About

Publications

Highlights

Articles

(En) Caruso, C., McAreavey R., Sirkeci, I. 2022. "Fuzzy edges of Social Capital: the migration-mobility nexus and social capital through the lens of a local Third Sector Organisation (TSO)". Voluntary Sector Review .

(En) Caruso, C., 2018. “The Syrian diaspora in London through the transnational lens. A distinctive contribution to contemporary public space and citizenship” Border Crossing. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol.8 No. 2.

(En) Caruso, C., 2014. “Nationality Undetermined: Voices of the Palestinian Diaspora in Italy”. Interventions. International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, Vol. 16 Issue 3.

(En) Caruso, C., 2013. “An Aesthetics of Diasporic Citizenship: the Example of Lebanese Women in the UK”. Citizenship Studies, Vol. 17 Issues 03-4.

(En) Caruso, C., 2011. “16th Century Jerusalem: a Model of Coexistence?” Jerusalem Quarterly, Institute of Palestine Studies, Beirut-Jerusalem, Winter - Issue 29.

 

Books or monographs

(It) Caruso, C., 2015. Etica, città, estetica. A partire da Gerusalemme. Cosenza: Edizioni Erranti.

(It) Caruso, C., 2009. Nazionalità: indeterminata. Voci della diaspora palestinese in Italia. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

 

Book chapters

(It) Caruso, C., 2008.  “Al di qua e al di là del confine: la diaspora palestinese in Italia”, in Barcellona, Pietro e Cavallo, Riccardo, (eds), L'Europa allo specchio, Vol. 2: Questioni sociali e forme di governo. Acireale-Roma: Bonanno.

Simon Usherwood, Alia Middleton, Carmen Caruso (2024)Why do civil society organizations working on international protection tend to have positive dispositions towards refugees? A macro-level opportunity structure model, In: International Journal of Migration and Border Studies Inderscience

Studies of civil society organizations (CSOs) working on international protection related issues have typically focused on those positively disposed towards refugees, without asking either whether this is the full range of dispositions in CSOs or why negatively disposed individuals appear not to mobilize in the same way. Using a novel survey of CSOs in Europe we show that most have positive dispositions, explained by attitudes towards international protection, which incentivizes such organizational forms. By contrast, those with negative dispositions are incentivized to focus their efforts on the party-political sphere, to regulate public policy to limit international protection.